Which agents of socialization are most important at certain stages of human development?

There are basically various agents of socialization within the dissimilar stages of benignant ripening. such(prenominal) different stages accrue diversity in attributes which helps in creating different models of concern in defining the outlay of importance in such different stages of human development. They may include the family and the helpmate members. Since the human development is compounded by various stages of concern, such different agents play different roles at such different times of human development.Generally, the family is entrenched with a diverse scope of importance in creating standards for moral development for the person at different stages. The family structures are indebted(predicate) to creating a lucrative environs with which a person is modeled into good morals. The foundations of the family are entrenched in diversity of moral foundations that makes in to cohere with the common societal structures. The principle structures of the family are therefore i mportant in creating standards that promote strong moral development for its members (Jared, 2005).The influence of friction match members is important in fictile the nature of personality of an individual. Since an individual interacts cohesively with his/her peer members, such an environment is persuasively important in creating a condition with which the person emulates and copies the behavioral conception of the peer members. This is therefore an intrinsic process of creating strong environment for personality development (Jared, 2005). Which theoretical perspective best supports your viewpoint?Eriksons theory of human development may perhaps be the most conventional in defending the rationale for these agents. He argued of human psychosocial development as entrenched within the environment that a person operates in. He has argued that the family is a complimentary facet that models the states of moral behavior of a person at early stages of development. Elsewhere, he has pinp ointed the role of peer groups in delivering qualitative attributes in shaping the scores of human personality at varied lengths (Jared, 2003).